Greetings, Traders!
Here’s the latest installment of Anatomy of a RadioActive Profit Machine, in which I walk the savvy Trader (that’s you!) through the steps that I took, showing how to make 200 shares of Humana Resources stock BULLETPROOF… meaning that you can benefit from HUM rising but cannot lose any capital if HUM falls.
Kinda cool. Especially since it’s still rising.
In order to do today’s lesson and learn how HUM became BULLETPROOF… we gotta go back a few articles and show the setup again, as well as the Income Method #6 play from last week.
After that, I’ll show another two totally riskless spread trades that made HUM so that it can’t lose, even with a market reversal or catastrophic news event.
SO… ready to see how that works? Read on, Trader!
In the first installment we saw the RadioActive Profit Machine initial setup, a unique kind of Married Put trade with an in-the-money put option and a far-out expiration:
March 11. 2011 Humana RPM (RadioActive Profit Machine)
1) HUM shares $63.90
2) Aug 2011 $65 put +$ 5.80
3) Total Invested $69.70
4) Guaranteed Exit -$65.00
5) Total Amount AT RISK $ 4.70
…or 6.7%
This unique setup makes for a guaranteed exit (line 4 above) of $65 regardless of where HUM actually ends up on the third Friday in August, 2011. This gives me a maximum loss of $4.70… if and ONLY if three conditions are present:
1) the stock actually does in fact go below $65 per share
2) I make no adjustments
3) I hold the position all the way to expiration
So while the above position does have a maximum AT RISK of $4.70 or 6.7% of my capital invested, it is very unlikely that I will suffer that entire loss… because two of the above three factors are within my control 😉
Here’s the graph of how she started out:
Click on the image to enlarge it and see greater detail.
You’ll note that it says, “$940 Max Risk” but this is because I used the above setup “times two”… that is, instead of getting 100 shares and one put it was 200 shares and two puts.
There’s still only 6.7% of the capital being used for the trade AT RISK. RadioActive Trading is scalable depending on how much capital you have.
That was the first post, now for a review of last week’s installment: When we last saw our hero, he had taken the market maker’s edge and put it on his side by using a ‘nested spread’. The RadioActive Trading Income Methods are ‘nested spread’ trades done within the context of a married put to reduce the cost basis, reduce risk, take income, OR..! All three.
The particular “Income Method” or ‘nested spread trade’ we saw last week was Income Method #6, Selling a Bear Call Spread.
Two .50 cent Bear Call Spreads could make $100, but risks $400
Remember that the Humana Resources RPM is insured clear out to August 2011.
However, ‘nested’ within that Married Put position is a second trade, an April $67.50/$70 Bear Call Spread.
I’d sold two April $67.50 calls for .95 cents, then used some of the proceeds to buy two April $70 calls at .45 cents. That’s .50 cents credit per spread, or $100 IN.
Click on the image to see the details more clearly. If HUM stays below $67.50, this play collects $100 for the Trader and reduces the cost basis of the MAIN trade… the Married Put position… by the same amount.
However, if the spread goes against, it could end up costing the Trader $400 bucks! …or could it?
The SECRET of ‘nested spreads’… the RadioActive Trading Income Methods… is that putting them on properly introduces no risk. Done correctly, Income Method #6 is a Bear Call Spread that collects a credit. But because of the fact that we already own stock, it cannot lose.
Come again?
Yes, the claim that the spread introduces no risk but takes a credit is a tall order, you betcha. But it’s true. Read further…
The ONLY way that the Bear Call Spread can end up hurting us is if the stock goes up… and! Don’t forget: we already own it. The graph shows what the combined positions look like.
The original AT RISK amount of the Married Put had been $940, and the AT RISK amount of the Bear Call Spread by itself was $400. But combining the two trades… NESTING one within another… eliminated some risk from both sides. $940 risk + $400 risk = $840 risk?
Yup.
And the BEST part about this is that the net position still has an unlimited upside… there is no cap to the possible gain. Heads you win, tails you don’t lose much!
Okay Trader, now you’re caught up to speed. Let’s go a bit further, shall we? What about going to heads you win, tails you win MORE… 😎
What we talked about showing you today was BULLETPROOFING… taking a position that has unlimited upside potential, then making it so that it cannot lose, even if something catastrophic happens to the stock.
Introducing a different ‘nested spread trade’. This one is called RadioActive Trading Income Method #4. If I were to sell August $65 puts and buy August $70 puts, we would (normally) call that configuration a Bear Put Spread. Here’s the graph:
Sell to Close $70 Puts – $4.35
Net DEBIT of “Income Method” 4: $2.80
Here’s the net result, graphically:
You can learn this from many FREE websites including the CBOE from people who do this full time.
Uh, YEAH. This is one such free site. It’s just done from the perspective of a ‘retail’ trader and FOR fellow retail traders. Duh. 😉
Yeah right, from a guy who is a full time Martial Arts instructor turned part time “pro” options trader; who loves theatrics. Maybe you should consider theater as your next endeavor >:)
OK, say one CAN learn all this from the free CBOE site, and perhaps other sites too. My sense is that “The Blueprint”, though it does come with a cost, not only saves time learning up to 10 income producing strategies, but it also makes the learning process understandable! I suspect that trying to learn this from the CBOE site would be like trying to learn how to make a fusion bomb by surfing the web.
Thoughts Kurt? I’m ready to buy.
Heh… By Jove, I think he’s got it!
Yes, the cost of The Blueprint was EARNED, baby… by my own blood, sweat, tears… CAPITAL… and what I’ve done with all these well-known spreads is to 1) make them easy to understand and 2) propose unique and striking ways to combine them.
One could begin with the same presuppositions that I did (limiting risk from the beginning, bulletproofing, and catching extra premium when the opportunity presents itself) and construct all the information contained in The Blueprint from scratch.
Catch is, to get where I am you’ll have to do what I’ve done. That means trading real time risking real dollars… collaborating with literally thousands of people using the same ideas from all over the world… and cataloguing their learned lessons along with your own and boilling it all down into an understandable format.
Is the info in The Blueprint available to anyone with enough time, capital, creativity, resources, and network of folks already using the system? Yup. But I have an idea for folks not willing to spend nine years and put tens of thousands of dollars AT RISK… buy The Blueprint! 😉 It’s got a money back guarantee and we’ve only ever returned about 1% of the books ordered. That alone should say something
Thanks for writing Jim! Happy Trading,
Kurt
Wait until you see the Blueprint Jim, you will have to learn lots of management and if you follow the number of possibilities in any one trade, it will make your head spin. Besides, the “Herd instinct” is akin to James Warren “Jim” Jones, who took a number of people to their death by just being a believer – Herd Instinct: The common tendency to adopt the opinions and follow the behaviour of the majority to feel safer and avoid conflict. There is an illusion of safety in numbers and if other people are doing it it can’t be that bad. There is also the shared comfort in knowing that if the trade goes badly, “We’re all in this together.” This is a terrible way to think, especially in trading. Herd instinct can also lead to speculative bubbles.
I just purchased the radioactive trading course and this is all starting to make good sense. I love this approach.
Thanks for the kudos, Clyde! be sure to use your support. Send any question regarding the strategies to support@radioactivetrading.com. TO search out the best candidates fro trading RadioActively, I use Power Options. Get two weeks free on me… KEEP your credit card info. Just input your name and email at http://www.poweropt.com/rat and they’ll take great care of you!
Happy Trading,
Kurt
Your email refers to “Market Makers Edge…change cost basis that was .25 under water the minute it was open, … over to having a cost basis that’s .25 in your favor instead”
I just don’t see how this article addresses “the minute it was open”. What I see is making future adjustments depending on what happens to the original positions(s), having to pay commissions on 6 positions, and each position gives away a bid/ask spread
You gotta point Dennis… I did apply this adjustment at a later time.
That said… I COULD have applied it right at the time I opened the trade, but did not. HUM went down, came back up. THEN I did the Income Method #6 adjustment when the premium was almost as much as I should have taken advantage of in the first place.
Yes, there are commissions to deal with, but that’s a reality on every trade. In the case of HUM described up to this point, my broker charges $19.90 for opening the Married Put (200 shares plus two puts), then only $9.95 for putting the Bear Call Spread (two short and two long call contracts) in place. That’s a total of $29.85 in commissions so far for an investment in which I’m playing tens of thousands of dollars.
The best part I’ve already pointed out: the Married Put risks $940 and the Bear Call Spread risks $400. But when they are coupled the total risk is not ADDED for $1340, but rather it comes down to $840. That’s the ‘edge’ I’m talking about… 100 bucks off the Married Put cost, well worth the $9.95 commish.
OH! And if the Bear Call Spread goes against me, it can’t hurt me either. Check the chart. For me to ‘lose’ the $400 risked by the Bear Call Spread, my stock has to go up. Since I own the stock, that’s a happy thing for me. If HUM hits $70 I’m still above water on the net position. If it doesn’t, I keep my 100 bucks and can do it again 😎
Edgy? Or not? Well, I happen to like taking income while I’m sitting on a stock. If you’ll notice, there’s still unlimited upside, a feature that a covered call trade does not provide.
HT,
K
Great thought Dennis, but market makers and brokerage houses LOVE this system, for it produces a ton of fees and commissions. Oh yes, does Kurt ever show what that does to your net?..Hmmm.
Yes I do MM. In a recent webinar I showed my ALTR trade with 500 shares protected by 5 put options. I did a ‘nested Ratio Call Spread”, then managed (bought to close) the short calls on that, then rolled my puts, then sold my stock, holding the puts separately (whew). All those commmisions took the profit on my capital invested from 12% to 11.9%. That’s what it did to the net, my dear fellow!
Aww, poor baby… it was hard to pay all the that commish 😉
The best parts about this trade: never more AT RISK than 6% of my total dollars invested, regardless of ‘flash crashes’ or other nonsense… being BULLETPROOF going into an earnings announcement… using the Income Methods to erdadicate risk WELL before the stock approached the so-called ‘break-even’ point that is suggested by the setup. In all, I would have to say I’m pretty good about disclosure, having publicly posted my trading record even through the crash of 2008.
Whew, if it was only that easy, we can all be winners and pay the commission rates that probably is somewhat less for you than the new kids on the block. But make no mistake sports fans, this is a bullish strategy and if you want to make money with a whole lot less work (and commissions), why not buy a deep in the money call and be in the money vs. out of the money with buying a costly put? I challenge Kurt to a dual. Give me a stock you show profit on recently, and I’ll do a “combination” trade and we will see who has the greater returns. And with a lot less money invested in the trade.
Game?
I propose a BETTER game. Because it’s easy to look at a winning play and in hindsight say, “Oh, but you could have done this much better if you had only…” That doesn’t, or at least SHOLDN’T impress anybody.
Here’s a duel that more closely approximates what reality looks like. I’ll choose and play ten stocks MY way, you put on a virtual trade YOUR way… only we commit ourselves to the record BEFORE they are winners or… (gulp) LOSERS.
Then we may compare results fairly. I’ll betcha dimes to donuts that your winners win more, but that your losers lose a LOT more. We’ll tally it all up and see who’s still grinnin’.
Shucks, I’ll even go the other way ’round. YOU pick the stocks and buy an ITM long call. I’ll play the same guys my way.
Then let’s compare results after the sh$t hits the fan… or not.
Wow, you’ve given me a great idea for another blog post 😉
[…] the Blog post series entitled, “Anatomy of a RadioActive Profit Machine“, I’ve shown you how you might take a stock and put option that are purchased together […]
Hey, let’s man up and do this with REAL money KF. At least if we cry, it’s over a real loss and not some fake money idea.
MM
So what happened between KF and MM? Who won?
Well, we here at RT continued to post our trades but MM did not, as he suggested, ‘man up’. Even giving him the option to choose the issues to trade beforehand did not give him the inclination to risk it.
I would have been happy to go head-to-head… AGAIN… with yet another gunslinger that claims to have a ‘better’ strategy.
http://blog.radioactivetrading.com/2011/07/response-to-another-challenge/
http://blog.radioactivetrading.com/2011/08/how-do-ya-like-my-married-put-now-heh-heh-gunslinger/